Little Red Riding transl. span essays

Little Red Riding transl. span essays A little girl lived with her mother in a small house near a great forest. The girl had neither father nor grandparents. She had a grandmother who was a widow also. Her grandmother lived in a small house on the other side of the forest. As the girl had the custom to use a red pointed hood, everybody called Little Red Riding Hood. - Daughter, your grandmother is ill. You want to take a candy basket to her? - Yes, of course, Mommy- responded Little Red Riding Hood, like she was a very amiable and likeable girl. - Good, here is the basket full of candy said the mother.- As you know, in order to arrive at the house of your grandma, you must cross the forest. In the forest there are wolves. Do not delay, and if a wolf approaches you, call to one of the numerous woodcutters who work in the forest. - I will travel with care, Mommy. I will arrive safely at grandmas house responded Little Red Riding Hood. Then the girl put the candy basket in an arm and soon she had entered the forest. Neglecting the wise advice of her mother of not delaying in the forest, Little Riding Hood was taking flowers and putting them in the basket. Suddenly a great wolf appeared, ferocious, and hungry. The favorite food of this wolf was the meat of little girls, but as it was scared of the woodcutters who worked near there, it resolved to obtain its favorite food with ma - Good morning, Little Riding Hood. Where are you going with that basket full of candies and flowers? Although the girl, since we have seen, was amiable and likeable, she had the great defect of being something disobedient and stupid. She had already disobeyed her mother when delaying in the forest to take flowers. And now she demonstrated her stupidity in answering the wolf instead of calling to the woodcutters. She said: ...

Definition of the Situation in Sociology

Definition of the Situation in Sociology The definition of the situation is what people use to know what is expected of them and what is expected of others in any given situation. Through the definition of the situation, people obtain a sense of the statuses and roles of those involved in the situation so that they know how to behave.  It is the agreed upon, subjective understanding of what will happen in a given situation or setting, and who will play which roles in the action. The concept refers to how our understanding of the social context of where we may be, like a  movie theater, bank, library, or supermarket informs our expectations of what we will do, who we will interact with, and for what purpose. As such, the definition of the situation is a core aspect of social order of a smoothly operating society. The definition of the situation is something that we learn through socialization, composed of prior experiences, knowledge of norms, customs, beliefs, and social expectations, and is also informed by individual and collective needs and wants. It is  a foundational concept within symbolic interaction theory and an important one within sociology, generally. The Theorists Behind the Definition of the Situation Sociologists William I. Thomas and Florian Znaniecki are credited with laying the theory and research groundwork for the concept that is known as the definition of the situation. They wrote about meaning and social interaction in their groundbreaking empirical study of Polish immigrants in Chicago, published in five volumes between 1918 and 1920. In the book, titled The Polish Peasant in Europe and America, they wrote that a  person has to take social meanings into account and interpret his experience not exclusively in terms of his own needs and wishes but also in terms of the traditions, customs, beliefs, and aspirations of his social milieu. By social meanings, they refer to the shared beliefs, cultural practices, and norms that become common sense to native members of a society. However, the first time the phrase appeared in print was in a 1921 book published by sociologists Robert E. Park and Ernest Burgess, Introduction to the Science of Sociology. In this book, Park and Burgess cited a Carnegie study published in 1919 which apparently used the phrase. They wrote, common participation in common activities implies a common definition of the situation. In fact, every single act, and eventually all moral life, is dependent upon the definition of the situation. A definition of the situation precedes and limits any possible action, and a redefinition of the situation changes the character of the action. In this final sentence Park and Burgess refer to a defining principle of symbolic interaction theory: action follows meaning. They argue, without a definition of the situation that is known among all participants, those involved wouldnt know what to do with themselves. And, once that definition is known, it sanctions certain actions while prohibiting others. Examples of the Situation An easy example to grasp how situations are defined and why this process is important is that of a written contract. A legally binding document, a contract, for employment or sale of goods, for example, lays out the roles played by those involved and specifies their responsibilities, and sets out actions and interactions that will take place given the situation as defined by the contract. But, its the less easily codified definition of a situation that interests sociologists, who use it to refer to a necessary aspect of all the interactions we have in our daily lives, also known as micro-sociology. Take, for example, riding a bus. Before we even get on a bus, we are engaged with a definition of a situation in which buses exist to serve our transportation needs in society. Based on that shared understanding, we have expectations of being able to find buses at certain times, at certain places, and to be able to access them for a certain price. As we enter the bus, we, and presumably the other passengers and the driver, work with a shared definition of the situation that dictates the actions we take as we enter the bus paying or swiping a pass, conversing with the driver, taking a seat or grabbing a hand-hold. If someone acts in a way that defies the definition of the situation, confusion, discomfort, and even chaos can ensue. Sources Burgess, E.W. Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Robert Ezra Park, Kindle Edition, Amazon Digital Services LLC, March 30, 2011. Thomas, William. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America: A CLASSIC WORK IN IMMIGRATION HISTORY. Florian Znaniecki, Paperback, Student edition, University of Illinois Press, January 1, 1996. Edited by Nicki Lisa Cole, Ph.D.

Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singers Famine, Affluence, and Essay

Analogy, Marginality and Action. Peter Singers Famine, Affluence, and Morality Analysis - Essay Example In the fifth paragraph, Singer emphasized that helping starving people is a moral obligation by people, but granted that it does not sacrifice anything that is â€Å"comparably† important. For instance, if by donating a hundred dollars in a foundation that feeds starving children and families in Africa would cost the life of your child who also needs the money for her operation, then one will be spared of guilt by keeping the money for his child’s operation instead. In other words, if a person acknowledges he or she can feed a single family in Africa by donating his money allotted for a fancy smart phone, then his action is morally justifiable and is fulfillment of duty. Another important assumption in Singer’s essay follows that proximity and distance are also factors in extending our moral duties to our fellow humans despite the fact that other people around us are not feeling obliged to do so. He emphasized that numbers cannot be used as a plausible excuse for not helping other people who are badly in need because we acknowledge that by donating without considering other people’s interest can actually save a single life or two. Singer’s central premise in his essay is summed up as extending our help to people in dire need, despite our proximity and distance, without sacrificing something that is equally significant. His point was that our morality may somehow explain that it is our moral obligation as human beings living in the same earth to extend our help by not being selfish and materialistic, and not only a show of charitable work because as what he said, people who give to charities are praised, while those who do not are not condemned. In other words, helping starving children, for instance, can well be shown as voluntary and not obligatory. People who choose to buy clothes rather than donating to the children of Africa cannot justify their action because they act in that manner so as to look pleasant and not to prote ct themselves. The Analogy The last sentence of the fifth paragraph tells us an analogy about a drowning child in a pond and a person happens to witness the child drowning. Singer’s analogy fits perfectly with his main assumption that we ought to help other people in need, despite the inability of other people to see her situation, and without sacrificing something that is comparably significant. Simply saying, in that situation, our clothes do not bear more significance compared to a life that is at risk. In other words, we prevent what is bad (the possible death of the child in the pond) and promote what is good (saving the life of the child). ‘Level of Marginality’ In giving away something to the needy, Singer puts a specific, yet abstract limit as to the amount we are obliged to. He used the phrase â€Å"until we reach the level of marginality.† It is like a common version found in the Christian bible that a way to heaven is by abandoning all of oneâ⠂¬â„¢s properties and wealth and giving them after to the poor. Singer requires â€Å"reducing ourselves to the level of marginal utility† (par. 27). In the moderate version of his premise, he does not imply that people ought to live in a level of marginal utility such that their families are likely to suffer in the end, as well. What he

Critically assess what, according to Richard Rorty, the pragmatist Essay

Critically assess what, according to Richard Rorty, the pragmatist says about truth - Essay Example In epistemology he opposes foundationalism, the view that all knowledge can be grounded, or justified, in a set of basic statements that do not themselves require justification. According to his â€Å"epistemological behaviorism,† Rorty holds that no statement is epistemologically more basic than any other, and no statement is ever justified â€Å"finally† but only relative to some circumscribed and contextually determined set of additional statements. In the philosophy of language Rorty rejects the idea that sentences or beliefs are â€Å"true† or â€Å"false† in any interesting sense other than being useful or successful within a broad social practice. He also opposes representationism, the view that the main function of language is to represent or picture pieces of an objectively existing reality. Finally, in metaphysics he rejects both realism and antirealism, or idealism, as products of mistaken representationalist assumptions about language. Richard Rorty was born in 1931 in New York City. He graduated from the Chicago of Rudolf Carnap in 1949, and has taught at Princeton, as well as the University of Virginia and Stanford. But he left the cautious world of analytical philosophy to go over to the enemy, thereby perfectly fitting the bill as lord of the dance to the subversives. He is also an example of a phenomenon common in France and Germany, but which exported to America better than to England, namely the public intellectual. In his case, it is a family tradition. Rorty, an only child, is the grandson of Walter Rauschenbusch, one of the founders of Americas social gospel movement, and both his parents were writers and active Trotskyites. "My parents were part of the anti-Stalinist left which centered on John Dewey," Rorty has said. Despite his own hostility to Marxism, he continues to place himself "wholeheartedly on the

Tax avoidance; a debate easily resolved Assignment

Tax avoidance; a debate easily resolved - Assignment Example According to, European Commission: Consultation on Double Non-Taxation Cases. (2012, May 1), tax avoidance is an approach where individuals use the legally provided tax policies to reduce the burden of taxation on them. In as much as such act is legal we will find that morally it is repugnant. In addition, the UK law tries as much as possible to minimize the loopholes that individuals are likely to use in tax avoidance schemes. The challenge though has been the sheer fact that the UK tax law is targeted as opposed to being purposive. There has been a consistent crop up of schemes that go around the law and these have further fueled legislative action. It is in record that so many commentators have advocated for the formulation of legislations to counter tax avoidance in general. This has been fueled by the fact that the establishment of the GAARs would ensure that efforts by the public to avoid taxation are thwarted (Freedman 2004). This further ensures that the taxpayer and the lawm akers divert their energies and efforts to other more productive activities. The tax authority is as well given the chance of being in the position of simplifying the law without being undermined. Among many other things, tax avoidance has been viewed to as well be an ethical issue in business. Companies have been found to seek for the minimization of their tax liabilities as a part of good governance through tax planning. They do so by making use and exploiting all the tools made available to them by the governments of the day (Sikka 2013). Such tools include allowances given, deductions advanced, and rebates. While tax planning is an open, convenient and compliant behavior, tax avoidance is a complex issue for most companies in the UK. Tax avoidance is a legitimate and it is the use of tools such as financial instruments to achieve tax desires that are favorable to the taxpayer while unanticipated by the government. Companies can employ the use of overseas

Importance of Customer Satisfaction

Importance of Customer Satisfaction Customer Service Introduction According to Hansemark and Albinsson(2004), satisfaction is an overall customer attitude towards a service provider, or an emotional reaction to the difference between what customers anticipate and what they receive, regarding the fulfilment of some need, goal or desire. Customer loyalty, on the other hand, according to Anderson and Jacobsen (2000) is actually the result of an organisation creating a benefit for a customer so that they will maintain or increase their purchases from the organisation. True customer loyalty is created when the customer becomes an advocate for the organisation, without incentive. To be successful, organizations must cater to the needs, wants and demands of their customers. That is the reason why many companies have continuously focused on the importance of customer satisfaction and loyalty. Moreover, it has a positive effect on an organisations profitability. There is also a close and positive connection between customer satisfaction and loyalty. Therefore, customer satisfaction and loyalty are all very important for an organization to be successful. Many researchers have looked into the importance of customer satisfaction. Kotler(2000) defined satisfaction as: a persons feelings (pleasure or disappointment) resulting from comparing a product performance in relation to his or her expectations. Hoyer and MacInnis (2001) said that satisfaction can be associated with feelings of acceptance, happiness, relief, excitement, and delight. There are many factors that affect customer satisfaction. According to Hokanson (2001), these factors include: friendly employees, courteous employees, knowledgeable employees, helpful employees, accuracy of billing, billing timeliness, competitive pricing, service quality, good value, billing clarity and quick service. In order to achieve customer satisfaction, organisations must be able to fulfil their customers needs and wants (La Barbera and Mazursky, 2000). Customers needs state the felt deprivation of a customer (Kotler, 2000).Whereas customers wants, according to Kotler (2000) refer to the form taken by human needs as they are shaped by culture and Individual personality. However, Bowen and Chen (2001) said that having satisfied customers is not enough, there has to be extremely satisfied customers. This is because customer satisfaction leads to customer loyalty. Bansal and Gupta (2001):Building customer loyalty is not a choice any longer with businesses: its the only way of building sustainable competitive advantage. Building loyalty with key customers has become a core marketing objective shared by key players in all industries catering to business customers. The strategic imperatives for Building a loyal customer base is as: Focus on key customers Proactively generate high level of Customer satisfaction with every Interaction Anticipate customer needs and respond to them before the competition does Build closer ties with customers Create a value perception Sivadas and Baker-Prewitt (2000) said there is an increasing recognition that the ultimate objective of customer satisfaction measurement should be customer loyalty. Fornell (2002) said high customer satisfaction will result in increased loyalty for the firm and that customers will be less prone to overtures from competition. This view was also shared by Anton (2002) who said that satisfaction is positively associated with repurchase intentions, likelihood of recommending a product or service, loyalty and profitability. Loyal customers would purchase from the firm over an extended period of time. (Evans and Berman, 2003). Guiltinan, Paul and Madden (2001) said that satisfied customers are more likely to be repeat (and even become loyal) customers. Sivadas and Baker-Prewitt (2000) Satisfaction also influences the likelihood of recommending a departmental store as well as repurchase but has no direct impact on loyalty. Thus satisfaction in itself will not translate into loyalty. However, satisfaction will foster loyalty to the extent that it is a prerequisite for maintaining a favourable relative attitude and for recommending and repurchasing from the Store. Once customers recommend a department store it shows loyalty towards that store. Thus the key to generating loyalty is to get customers to recommend a store to others. Also, customers are likely to recommend a department store when they are satisfied with that store and when they have a favourable relative attitude towards that store. Evans and Berman (2003): Companies with satisfied customers have a good opportunity to convert them into loyal customers who purchases from those firms over an extended period. Conclusion Based on the views and research, it can be concluded that customer satisfaction is very important. Thus, though customer satisfaction does not guarantee repurchase on the part of the customers but still it plays a very important part in ensuring customer loyalty. This point has been echoed by Gerpott et al. (2001) when they said customer satisfaction is a direct determining factor in customer loyalty, which, in turn, is a central determinant of customer retention. Therefore, according to me, organisations should always strive to ensure that their customers are very satisfied. References Anderson, H. Jacobsen P. N., 2000, Creating Loyalty: Its Strategic Importance in Your Customer Strategy. Bansal, S. Gupta, G., 2001, Building Customer Loyalty Business-to-Business Commerce. Bowen, J. T. Chen, S. L., May 2001, the Relationship between Customer Loyalty and Customer Satisfaction, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality. Evans, J. R. Lindsay, W. M., 2003, the Management and Control of Quality. 3rd Ed. Guiltinan, J. P., Paul, G. W. Madden, T. J.,2001, Marketing Management: Strategies and Programs Hansemark, O. C. Albinson, M., 2004, Customer Satisfaction and Retention: The Experiences of Individual Employees, Managing Service Quality. Hoyer, W. D. MacInnis, D. J., 2001, Consumer Behaviour. 2nd Ed. Hokanson, S., January 2, 2001, The Deeper You Analyse, The More You Satisfy Customers Kotler, P., 2000, Marketing Management. 10th Ed. LaBarbera, P. A. Mazursky, D., 2000, A Longitudinal Assessment of Consumer Satisfaction. Sivadass, E. Baker-Prewitt, J. L., 2000, An Examination of the Relationship Between Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, and Store Loyalty.

Iraq - military campaign Essay -- essays research papers

Abstract  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  1 1.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Introduction  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  2 2.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Past experience  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  2 3.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Diplomatic problems  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  2 4.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Concept of Operation  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  3 5.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The campaign  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  3 5.1.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Air power  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  4 5.2.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ground operations and special forces  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  5 5.3.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Iraqi strategy and tactics  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  5 6.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Intelligence  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  6 7.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Psychological operations  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  6 8.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Public relations  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  6 9.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Technology  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  6 10.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Casualties  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  7 11.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Weapons of mass destruction (WMD)  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  7 12.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Conclusion  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  7 13.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  References:  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  8 14.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Glossary of terms  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  9 1.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  warfare  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  9 2.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  vanguard  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  10 3.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  breach  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  11 4.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  sortie  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  12 5.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  enclave  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  13 6.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  domain  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  14 7.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  envisage  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  15 8.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  resistance  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  16 9.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  paramilitary  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  17 10.  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  campaign  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  18 Abstract This article draws together early military implications of a campaign where intensive operations lasted just about a month. The deeper insights will need much more time for the post operations reports to be written, detailed batt... ...#8226;  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Does technology replace troops? •Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Can air power now eliminate the power of armies to defend? •Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Do logistics still constrain rates of advancement? •Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Are special forces assuming greater importance for future warfare? •Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Did the coalition get its media strategy right? •Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  How accurate was intelligence? •Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  How important are allies? •Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  What are the combat applications of the need to rebuild a nation after a conflict? Now, more than a year after the official end of the war, one thing is clear. Only the military part of the operation went approximately according to plan. Everything else went wrong. The peace still hasn’t returned to the country and it seems that occupational forces can’t provide it. The country is on the edge of religious war and it will be hard to extinguish that flame. Iraqis and democracy had to pay high price for cheap gasoline in the United States.